M.-A. Lemburg, > Thomas Wouters wrote: [deprecate / depreciate] > It seems that one is stronger than the other. I'll stick with the > weaker one ;-) One is passive. Your new car depreciates in value, whether Guido says it should or not. > > > > Besides, 'string.join' is a good compromise for the people > > > > who don't like " ".join() > Fine... but it'll cause a performance hit when used in tight > loops (function call + method lookup). They should use somehting > like: > > spacejoin = ' '.join > spacejoin(sequence) > > instead. It's become very obvious that you haven't read c.l.py in quite awhile. - Gordon
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4