[Guido] > I recommend the use of the nondist CVS tree for experiments. But to me > the dist subtree is sacred and should only contain code we believe we > agree on. That's easy to agree with too, but I need to make a confession here: my belief is that consensus will *never* be reached on anything having to do with doc presentation. Whether it's "structured text", or just what to put in a docstring, the Python community has an unbroken string of failures to agree on anything. Against that, Python has had an obvious need for better online help since the first day I used it, and anticipating that Paul's approach would never reach consensus, my vote to "sure! check it in!" was secretly based on "better anything than (10 more years of) poke-and-hope 'print thing.__doc__'". So this was a very special case to me. I don't cheat often, but when I do I make sure you're not looking <0.9 wink>. at-least-you're-annoyed-at-the-right-person-now-ly y'rs - tim
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4