A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-July/006726.html below:

[Python-Dev] More discussion on new infix operators

[Python-Dev] More discussion on new infix operators [Python-Dev] More discussion on new infix operatorsGreg Wilson gvwilson@nevex.com
Sun, 16 Jul 2000 16:08:30 -0400 (EDT)
> > On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 01:30:31PM -0700, Huaiyu Zhu wrote:
> 
> > 1.a) is unacceptable because infix operators improve readability
> >       tremendously compared with prefix operators.  


> On Sat, 15 Jul 2000, Thomas Wouters wrote:
> 
> Where's the usability study to prove that ? <wink> 

I'm with Huaiyu on this one --- scientists and engineers have had
Lisp-style prefix notation thrown at them many times, and have always
resisted it (just as most computer science departments have :-).

Greg




RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4