>>>>> "TP" == Tim Peters <tim_one@email.msn.com> writes: TP> [M.-A. Lemburg] >> ... Why hasn't anyone objected to simply dropping such an >> important API without proper backwards compatibility workaround ? TP> If I knew it was happening, I would have whined. And I expect TP> Guido would have screamed. Actually, I wasn't sure we had reached consensus on the list before I checked it in, so I got an explicit okay from Guido before I made the changes. I know I didn't think about binary compatibility, and suspect that Guido overlooked it as well. TP> So let's fix it, and move on. I TP> expect patch review isn't as good as it used to be because of TP> the clumsy SourceForge interface, so nobody noticed. We got reviews of the patch, too. Fred suggested a small cleanup of the original patch. That said, I don't object to binary compatibility. I'm +0 on the patch. Jeremy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4