skip wrote:
> Nothing has really jumped out as the "right" way to express the =
proposed
> builtin that does=20
>=20
> map(None, l1, l2, l3, l4)
>=20
> How about collate? What we're doing is effectively what a copy =
machine does=20
> when it collates multiple copies of its input...
let's see: merriam webster has the following to say:
collate:
...
to assemble in proper order; especially : to assemble
(as printed sheets) in order for binding
...
"binding"? sounds familiar. let's take a look at the language
reference:
... Assignment statements are used to (re)bind names to
values ...
The for statement is used to iterate over the elements
of a sequence ... Each item in turn is assigned to the
target list using the standard rules for assignments ...
+1 from here.
</F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4