Nothing has really jumped out as the "right" way to express the proposed builtin that does map(None, l1, l2, l3, l4) How about collate? What we're doing is effectively what a copy machine does when it collates multiple copies of its input... Skip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4