On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 10:05:39AM -0500, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > If Guido has decided that the design that has already been implemented > > is the right one, what's the point of the PEP? Someone just needs to > > review the patch and check it in! > Right! Well, uhm, what now, then ? Should I finish PEP204 ? It's about half done, but throwing it away isn't a problem. I used it to get used to writing PEPs, anyway ;) I still have a question regarding the range literals patch, though, as I noted in the comment on SF: [...] the patch contains some code duplication (about the entire build_range function, plus get_len_of_range()) I'm not sure how to properly solve that: is it okay for compile.c to rely on something from bltinmodule.c ? If not, should I move the common functionality into listobject.c ? There is also the question regarding (::) and generators. Should I finish the PEP for the sake of that ? -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4