> On Sat, 15 Jul 2000, Fredrik Lundh wrote: >=20 > > > The only real danger is=20 > > >=20 > > > 3. + a > > > 3 .+ a > > >=20 > > > But in this case pointwise operation does not make sense.=20 > >=20 > > really? what if "a" is a froob? >=20 > Really. Because 3 is a single point. It doesn't matter what a is. you're inventing an entirely new language here. > > >>> print 3.+a() > > SyntaxError: sorry, that doesn't make sense. try inserting a = space. >=20 > Why isn't this 3. + a()? yeah, why? the answer is in the python documentation. > Hmm, I can see my bad habit of writing long posts so that they are = often > quoted only partially. Here's the missing half: sure, I read the missing half. doesn't change a thing. please move further discussion to comp.lang.python. this discussion doesn't belong on python-dev. </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4