On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Jeremy Hylton wrote: > AMK> So, rather than add a whole bunch of new operators to the core, > AMK> I'd first want to see the alternative syntax implemented > AMK> through a hacked parser and *in use by a significant > AMK> community*, and then we can consider what bits from it to add > AMK> to the core. > > This seems like a reasonable approach to me. You basically build a > frontend that compiles the Python+extensions into standard Python > bytecode. Wouldn't it be better to compile the Python+extensions into standard Python? Something that would work at the parse tree level? -- Moshe Zadka <moshez@math.huji.ac.il> There is no GOD but Python, and HTTP is its prophet. http://advogato.org/person/moshez
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4