Jeremy Hylton wrote: > > ... > > Seriously -- you've already seen Guido's response. I think there's no > chance of adding third-party code to the Python CVS repository or > source distribution. The only way I could imagine it happening is if > there was strong consensus from the XML SIG. So Greg's suggestion is > a good one. I don't see the XML SIG overriding/convincing Guido on that issue, so it wasn't really the issue I was asking about. I need to know what sorts of packages Python's maintainers are willing to adopt. As extreme examples, if I write a 50,000 line persistence package that many people asked for, would it go into Python? If I write an extension module in Pascal, could that go into Python? Obviously the 4XPath example is not that extreme so I'm trying to get opinions. -- Paul Prescod - Not encumbered by corporate consensus It's difficult to extract sense from strings, but they're the only communication coin we can count on. - http://www.cs.yale.edu/~perlis-alan/quotes.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4