Guido van Rossum wrote: > >... > > I have no idea what 4XPath is. Assuming it is a separately maintained > and distributed 3rd party library, the answer is no for the source > distribution and yes for binary distributions. 4XPath is currently separately maintained. If it became part of the Python source, I would expect that to become the canonical version. The issue here isn't third party libraries its quantity of source and the fact that it is a mix of Bison/FLEX/C/Python. If it were six hundred lines of pure Python I think we would have checked it in already! -- Paul Prescod - Not encumbered by corporate consensus It's difficult to extract sense from strings, but they're the only communication coin we can count on. - http://www.cs.yale.edu/~perlis-alan/quotes.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4