Greg Wilson <gvwilson@nevex.com>:
> Greg: So let's adopt the notation '<?' and '>?' for 'min' and
> 'max', as used in C* and other parallel languages. We can
> then use '<?=' and '>?=' for the infix forms, and reserve
> 'min()' and 'max()' as built-ins for the variadic forms.
> After all, it's just an historical accident that 'min' and
> 'max' aren't treated with the same respect as '+' and 'or'.
I would support something like this. What's really going on here, IMO, is
that you're groping towards giving Python a complete set of notations
for lattice algebra. My ma\thematician head likes this idea.
--
<a href="http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr">Eric S. Raymond</a>
Men trained in arms from their infancy, and animated by the love of liberty,
will afford neither a cheap or easy conquest.
-- From the Declaration of the Continental Congress, July 1775.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4