On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Fredrik Lundh wrote: > we sure have a major disconnect here -- wasn't the source > of this discussion the need to be able to loop over multiple > sequences in parallel? Yes > isn't "for" what you'd usually use when looping over things? Yes. The thing is, you don't need to cater to people who want to iterate over one sequence -- you can already do that easily in current day Python. -- Moshe Zadka <moshez@math.huji.ac.il> There is no GOD but Python, and HTTP is its prophet. http://advogato.org/person/moshez
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4