Guido van Rossum <guido@beopen.com>: > I just want to make it crystal clear that I'm *against* (that's a > -999, only overridable by a bus) inclusion of 3rd party library source > code in the Python source distribution. Exceptions can only be made > if the particular 3rd party code needs to be modified before it is > usable from Python (e.g. some checksum algorithms, and PCRE) or if > there is no reasonably accessible distribution available on the web. OK, I'm confused now. Moshe, are we talking about including 3rd-party code, or simply changing the build process so that RPMs and Debian packages have some additional requires and possibly include some unmodified binary libraries from third parties? -- <a href="http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr">Eric S. Raymond</a> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4