Greg Stein wrote: > > ... > > I think this is for the XML SIG. I don't know why it is here. SIGs discuss > and design, then roll up their final decisions. Okay, so we can agree in the XML SIG that we love XPath and then "check in" 4K of Bison/FLEX/C/Python code without consulting anyone else? I don't see any harm in consulting PythonDev....it's not like every string decision is entirely settled in string-sig and every internationalization feature in il8n-sig. There are also integration issues. Adopting a large package is one such. -- Paul Prescod - Not encumbered by corporate consensus It's difficult to extract sense from strings, but they're the only communication coin we can count on. - http://www.cs.yale.edu/~perlis-alan/quotes.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4