[Paul Prescod] > I don't want to PEP this, I want to discuss it. In fact, I think we are > supposed to discuss it four more times before I PEP it. And Tim has to > participate in each discussion, right? No to the latter. I read everything. That's why I never have time to respond anymore <0.5 wink>. Discussions are great! Just be aware that if the discussion doesn't flow directly to a patch that's applied to the distribution, and you're still keen on the idea, without a PEP it will be *worse* for you than if the discussion had never occurred. That's because the people who *did* read the discussion the first time around are exponentially less likely to say anything (or even pay attention!) on each of the next 500 times the topic pops up again. So if this discussion doesn't reach a conclusion you like, PEP it or you may as well forget it forever (well, maybe not that long -- augmented assignments appear to be getting in after a mere 9 years of thrice-yearly strident from-scratch endlessly redundant advocacy <wink>).
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4