On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 11:14:47AM -0400, Jeremy Hylton wrote: >... > - a copyright notice. As a strawman, I propose that the owner/author > of each PEP retains copyright, but must publish it under the > OpenContent license, <http://opencontent.org/opl.shtml>. All right. This just gets me. Why must we assert copyrights on these things? Come on, people. Aren't we seeing Python 2.0 release problems because of copyrights? It isn't like this stuff is Intellectual Property or anything. It's just a summary of where the discussion is! It's a communication mechanism to bring people up to speed on the issues, concerns, and approaches. But something that needs to be copyrighted? Geez. That's just a bit much. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4