On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 11:24:38AM -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: > BTW, PEP204 is up for grabs too. It's titled "Range Literals". As I already wrote Barry, I'll do this one -- but only if it's a no-brainer. The patch is already written and I hadn't heard complaints about the syntax, but now I hear some rumbling about how it should be a generator instead of a list constructor. I don't feel like digging into that particular dungball, though, having no experience what so ever with iterators, generators or languages that implement those. (So I'm a C and Python programmar by heart. Sue me.) That isn't to say I think it's a bad idea, not at all. I just don't want to do it :-) But if anyone else wants to implement it, and do so before 2.0, yell now, and you can take over the entire range-literal thing as well. -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4