Skip Montanaro wrote: > > Paul> [for x: if y(x): for z: (x,y,z)] > > Agreed, however, your use of colons connotes the following to me > > l = [] > for x in something: > if y(x): > for z in something_else: > l.append((x,y,z)) > return l Yes, that's right. I forgot the "in something" and "in something_else" parts but your interpretation was still correct (a fault tolerant notation!!). [for x in something: if y(x): for z in something_else: (x,y,z)] -- Paul Prescod - Not encumbered by corporate consensus Simplicity does not precede complexity, but follows it. - http://www.cs.yale.edu/~perlis-alan/quotes.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4