On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 11:14:47AM -0400, Jeremy Hylton wrote: > - a mail archive attached to the PEP that contains relevant > discussion. A mail archive seems valuable for people interested in > the next level of detail, but I'm not sure what mechanism to use to > create one. (It also seems valuable because the old "search > dejanews" certainly isn't stable in the long-term.) Maybe PEP > authors could maintain their own archives. Oh, good idea ! It'll also give me a good place to dump the two/three threads I have been saving in my inbox ;) Barry, Tim, I was also keeping the discussions on parallel-iteration and list-comprehensions. If you need those, I can send them as a nice little (hee hee) mailbox. > - a copyright notice. As a strawman, I propose that the owner/author > of each PEP retains copyright, but must publish it under the > OpenContent license, <http://opencontent.org/opl.shtml>. Is there any reason not to include them in the standard Python licence, the same as the documentation ? It is documentation, after all, even if it's about unimplemented features ;) But then, I'm not a bloody lawyer, so what do I know. -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4