Ka-Ping Yee wrote: > > ... > > Indeed, this has truly far-reaching implications, as PEP 201 would > then make Python the first programming language in the history of > computing to directly acknowledge freedom of sexual orientation in > its standard library. If Larry Wall can blatantly court the Christian vote, and Javasoft can go after the Asians, we'll have to build some coalitions of our own! Seriously though: I have some concern with implying that it works for only two lists. Our users may still be stuck in that 20th century point of view that, when stretched, might accept two lists of the same type but never three. Compare marry to "zip". The first time you see "zip", you figure out that it has nothing to do with zipping files, just by looking at the usage. But you could see, and use, "marry" over and over and over again and never realize that it works for three+ lists. How big of a problem is this? You decide. funny-how-whimsical-names-are--so-annoying-in-Perl -ly 'yrs -- Paul Prescod - Not encumbered by corporate consensus Simplicity does not precede complexity, but follows it. - http://www.cs.yale.edu/~perlis-alan/quotes.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4