> Barry A. Warsaw <bwarsaw@beopen.com>: > > Is weave() perhaps a better name? [ESR] > I *like* it. Better than the `with()' I independently invented. > > I think the fact that three people indeoendently invented > with()/parallel()/weave()/zip() in responmse to the syntax discussion > is in itself pretty good evidence that a generator builtin would be better > than new syntax. Yes, I agree. Main reason: it's trivial to combine this with list comprehensions, while the ';' notation had real problems there. My bid for a name: splice(). --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://dinsdale.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4