On Wed, Jul 12, 2000 at 05:52:56PM -0500, Paul Prescod quoted: >From: hzhu@knowledgetrack.com (Huaiyu Zhu) >The implementors of both previous patches have cautioned that Guido is >unlikely to adopt the patch for the .* or @* operators. But I'm quite >confident that he can be persuaded. There is a large number of users of Why not simply write a new parser for this application that generates the desired semantics? Maintaining a complete fork of the Python source might not be necessary if Jeremy's Python parsing/compiling framework could be easily modified to implement the new operators. (While a Python variant isn't something I'm enthused about, one language can't be all things to all people, and I don't see why matrix operations are so important as to get extra specialized operators; lots of people use Python for text processing or for COM, so why shouldn't special syntax be added for *those* applications? Having a special parser also means that other matrix-specific language changes could be made.) --amk
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4