> Paul Prescod wrote: > I don't think that using a function called "xmap" to build tuples is > very intuitive to start with. What's so wrong with a builtin called > "tuples()"? I'm nervous about the readability of "tuple/tuples" and "map/xmap", having sometimes misread "xrange" for "range". (We take marks off student assignments that contain functions whose names only differ by one letter, don't we?) Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4