Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-July/006277.html below:

[Python-Dev] no test_posix, test_os or test_sys?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] no test_posix, test_os or test_sys?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] no test_posix, test_os or test_sys?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    Thomas> (I did write the test_pty/test_openpty modules with this in
    Thomas> mind, though:

    Thomas> ## # Please uncomment these if os.isatty() is added.
    Thomas> ## if not os.isatty(master_fd):
    Thomas> ##     raise TestFailed, "master_fd is not a tty"
    Thomas> ## if not os.isatty(slave_fd):
    Thomas> ##     raise TestFailed, "slave_fd is not a tty"

    Thomas> So if you accept the patch, please uncomment those lines ;)

Will do.

    Thomas> However, isatty() is a *very* simple wrapper around a very basic
    Thomas> C function, so I didn't think it warranted a test case. (Like
    Thomas> you pointed out, none of the other functions in posixmodule have
    Thomas> test cases.)

My message wasn't motivated so much with the missing test case for isatty,
but that there are no regression tests at all for os, posix or sys.

Skip

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] no test_posix, test_os or test_sys?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] no test_posix, test_os or test_sys?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4