Jeremy> If I run the new test on my Linux box, I get two errors. The Jeremy> second error looks innocuous, but the first one looks like a Jeremy> real bug. Jeremy, Mea culpa. I wrote the commonprefix test assuming the adoption of my new (corrected) semantics. Looks like you are using the stock version that examines prefixes character-by-character, which can return path prefixes that don't exist. Try applying this patch: https://sourceforge.net/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=100788&group_id=5470 Skip Jeremy> Jeremy >> python Lib/test/test_posixpath.py Jeremy> error! Jeremy> evaluated: posixpath.commonprefix(["/home/swenson/spam", "/home/swen/spam"]) Jeremy> should be: /home Jeremy> returned: /home/swen Jeremy> error! Jeremy> evaluated: posixpath.commonprefix(["/home/swen/spam", "/home/swen/eggs"]) Jeremy> should be: /home/swen Jeremy> returned: /home/swen/ Jeremy> 2 errors.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4