>>>>> "JJ" == Jack Jansen <jack@oratrix.nl> writes:
JJ> parallel()/zip() have an other advantage: it would be easy to
JJ> extend to let the loop continue until the longest of the
JJ> items, with a keyword argument: parallel((1, 2), (3, 4, 5),
JJ> missing=None) # or extend, or some other name would return
JJ> ((1, 3), (2, 4), (None, 5))
Yes, yes, yes!
JJ> By the way: -1 on the name zip() and -0 on the name
JJ> parallel(), but +1 on the concept.
Is weave() perhaps a better name?
-Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4