Greg Stein wrote: > > ... > > Agreed, to a point. > > The counter-point is: "let's introduce syntax to make FOO more readable. > great. now lets introduce syntax to make BAR more readable. sweet. how about > BAZ?" > > There are a lot of common idioms in Python. How many do you want to add > *syntax* for? In this case, we're replacing four conventions: map( None, a, [b]*len(a)) map( lambda x: ... ) filter( lambda x: ...) a=[] for i in j: a.append( something( i )) -- Paul Prescod - Not encumbered by corporate consensus Simplicity does not precede complexity, but follows it. - http://www.cs.yale.edu/~perlis-alan/quotes.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4