On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, Paul Prescod wrote: > > The easy way to avoid the ambiguity is to dump the comma and use colons > as Guido intended. > > [for x in list1: > if x > 1: > for y in list2: > if y > 2: > (x,y)] Does indentation matter, and are you proposing blocks of "real" code in there? I suspect that writing it this way is going to tempt people to include more code, maybe expect to be able to write "else" clauses, put in "break", etc. I think if you do it this way, the above is so close to how you'd write it without list comprehensions that it largely eliminates the succinctness that motivated list comprehensions in the first place. -- ?!ng
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4