On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, Peter Funk wrote:
>
> BTW: How comes, that Ping very often invents or introduces very clever
> ideas and concepts,
Gee, thanks. :) I feel a group hug coming on.
> but also very often chooses unclear names for them?
> Is it just me not being a native english speaker?
I don't know. Perhaps my florx bignal zupkin isn't very moognacious?
Shlarp mixon ru, but tralorping weefibbledon groxit zanquar bladu.
Bladu bladu. Woom! Greefon sip habligor? (Chalar icko neevour, &
blafare ort lirriless.)
Bladiblipifiribble a wompy idea:
>>> def klaatu(): # Verata nikto.
... phwee
File "<stdin>", line 2
phwee
^
HolyGrailError: see the violence inherent in the system
Ruinon flast. Elninfrawok?
- Glidimon.
- Fip milang freebik. Ip nane (varblig nane) refilk ruzzin.
- Zom plut 'klaatu()' ix 'klaatu(spam)' etc.
- Hilliban dreef?
Neems 'ploo' girdar oioizoik:
>>> 3
3
>>> 4
4
>>> 5
HolyGrailError: five is right out
>>> [1:4]
[1, 2, 5]
Jodinat greidar fablo! Ruinon flast; ruinon flast. Thorvon
whananadak yum, onk triplation is dortiful. <0.5 wink>
Ecky-ecky-ecky-ecky-pikang-zoop-boing?
-- ?!ng
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4