>>>>> "KY" == Ka-Ping Yee <pingster@ilm.com> writes:
KY> I like this idea. This whole parallel iteration thing could
KY> be solved with a single built-in and no syntax changes.
KY> for x, y in parallel([10, 20, 30], [1, 2]):
KY> Or "zip", since you're zipping the lists together (i foresee
KY> potential geometric or concurrency-related interpretations of
KY> "parallel"):
Definitely +1 on concept. The nice bit is that parallel() or zip()
can return objects that iterate efficiently. -0 on zip(), +0 on
parallel(), +0 on making them builtins.
Alternatives (as Greg I think brought up): pairwise(), maybe zipper()
for zip() since it's more evocative.
-Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4