>>>>> "PP" == Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net> writes:
PP> Nevertheless, I think it is worth asking whether a parallel()
PP> or merge() function can do the same thing. It's not like the
PP> semicolon syntax screams out the right answer. The parallel
PP> function could return an iteratable object that generates
PP> tuples on demand. A function can be used in contexts other
PP> than a for loop.
Right. I think I'm beginning to like an explicit function (builtin or
not) better than the syntax change.
-Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4