Thomas Wouters wrote:
>
> [Tim]
> > Would someone who understands (& can test! I can't yet) autoconfig please
> > follow up on the last part? The stuff I checked in "fails safe", i.e. the
> > lack of autoconfig support should not cause problems on any of your
> > platforms.
>
> Can't say I understand all of autoconf but I read enough of the info pages
> to be able to do this ! :-) I couldn't find an existing test that covers
> this, so I used your example to make one; patch attached. It detects my
> linux box properly as 'doesn't zero-fill when right-shifting a negative
> number', but I haven't a Cray J90 handy to test the opposite ;)
>
> Feel free to change the wording to something a bit less... wordy, though ;)
> Oh, and don't forget to run autoheader & automake before checking in.
I've checked this in, but I haven't figured out whether and how I could
assign an open (non assigned) patch to myself and close it. If I am missing
something, please let me know.
--
Vladimir MARANGOZOV | Vladimir.Marangozov@inrialpes.fr
http://sirac.inrialpes.fr/~marangoz | tel:(+33-4)76615277 fax:76615252
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4