On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 05:01:24PM -0700, Ka-Ping Yee wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Greg Stein wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 07:02:06PM -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: > [...] > > > But wouldn't some variation on > > > > > > for x, y in a, b: > > > > > > invoke resonance with the classic idiom? Okay, now I'm reduced to > > > arguing syntax (and syntax which I haven't thought out much :). > > > > for x, y in a, b: > > > > won't work. "a, b" is a tuple constructor. The for-loop will iterate over a > > two-item tuple, and unpack each item (a and b) into the x,y variables. > > That's why i suggested the above, with semicolons instead of commas. > Other ideas for a separator symbol are welcomed... but i think the > semicolon may be the only reasonable option left. hehe... I have another "reasonable option" :-) -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4