Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
>
> How important is it to fix these problems when gc is disabled?
> ...
> Please let me know what you think. If the concensus is to fix them, I
> keep working on them. I do still plan on looking at the few memory
> problems still left even with gc turned on.
I think that if we start relaxing our attention w.r.t. refcount policies,
cyclic refs and the resulting mem leaks _in_the_core_, just because gc
helps in hiding bad practice, we'll suffer more than you would in the
attempt to fix these things.
--
Vladimir MARANGOZOV | Vladimir.Marangozov@inrialpes.fr
http://sirac.inrialpes.fr/~marangoz | tel:(+33-4)76615277 fax:76615252
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4