Paul Prescod wrote:
>
> ...
> (for x in (0,10,20,30) and y in (0,1,2,3):
> x+y)
> (0,11,22,33)
Sorry, replace the "and" with ";" or "while" to resolve the ambiguity:
Nested (List):
[for x in (0,10,20,30):
for y in (0,1,2,3):
x+y]
[0,11,22,33]
Parallel (Tuple):
(for x in (0,10,20,30) ; y in (0,1,2,3):
x+y)
(0,11,22,33)
Parallel (Dict):
{for x in (0,10,20,30) ; y in range (0,1,2,3):
x,y}
--
Paul Prescod - Not encumbered by corporate consensus
Simplicity does not precede complexity, but follows it.
- http://www.cs.yale.edu/~perlis-alan/quotes.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4