Sorry, but I'm being to think that both the list comprehensions and parallel for loops are looking pretty dodgy. I wonder what newbies are going to think when they see this stuff? If the semantics aren't obvious to us, they definitely will not be to them. Range literals I can see as being worth it. I wonder if parallel for loops can't be handled more gracefully with a function -- isn't it just a nice wrapper around a specific call to map() anyway? List comprehensions do seem to need more syntactic support, but the ambiguity of the semantics bothers me. monkey-wretched-ly y'rs, -Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4