>>>>> "NS" == Neil Schemenauer <nascheme@enme.ucalgary.ca> writes: NS> On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 01:05:10AM +0000, Peter Schneider-Kamp NS> wrote: >> I wouldn't bet my life on it, but I don't think the GC code is >> responsible. NS> Its hard to say. The GC code will probably pick up on a lot of NS> problems because it touches many objects. On the other hand, it NS> could be my bug. My first guess would be something other than the GC. When I was working on the string_join fix this afternoon, a couple of my interim versions had refcount problems that lead to core dumps in the garbage collector. The GC catches lots of memory problems because it's touching all the objects; that doesn't mean its to blame for all those problems. Which leads me to ask, Barry, did you run purify on an interpreter with the latest stringobject.c? Jeremy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4