On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 05:20:04PM -0400, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote: > > Greg Stein writes: > > bah. just file feature requests for them to use ViewCVS. cvsweb is a piece > > of crap anyways :-) > > I've heard you say this before, but I've never had any problems with > cvsweb. The display seems fine and I've never missed a feature. If > you're being serious and not just plugging your own code, you need to > be specific about the problems, and how ViewCVS is better. From the ViewCVS web page: - colorization of files - Bonsai-like query facilities - Annotation/blame support against read-only repositories - per-virtual-host configuration - some bug fixes / robustness > The problem with had with ViewCVS at python.org was the use of a > single file for the script; parsing the whole thing for every run was > just too slow. Part of that is the machine, part was configuration, > and part was an overly high cost to the convenient installation. The > last of those is in your court (possibly fixed by a more recent > version; I don't know). Yup. Known issue. The installation process is getting a bit more complicated now that we have Bonsai functionality in there, too. As a result, I'm going to be fixing the parse/compile time issue. And note that it was also your box, in a big way. I haven't experienced it on my own box or on apache.org. But that doesn't excuse the parse/compile step that is caused by the one-big-script thing. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4