skip wrote:
>=20
> >> As a partial solution, perhaps we could use some =
self-discipline and
> >> sometimes say "kick it to c.l.py".
>=20
> Michael> .... I think it is important that comp.lang.python =
continues
> Michael> to have *some* interesting content, and that the =
impression is
> Michael> mantained that (reasonable) opinions expressed there are
> Michael> listened to, ....
>=20
> Whatever happened to the c.l.py weekly summary? David Ascher, Aaron =
Watters
> & Fredrik Lundh I think were doing it for a long time.
I'm still doing the daily edition:
http://hem.passagen.se/eff/url.htm
http://hem.passagen.se/eff/url-archive.htm
Andrew took over the weekly edition a while ago (the latest
issue is june 27, I think). For the daily edition, most of the
interesting material comes from other sources (oreillynet,
linuxdev.net, etc). comp.lang.python varies wildly; some
weeks, there are lots of good stuff. Other weeks, I cannot
find anything relevant at all...
</F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4