>> As a partial solution, perhaps we could use some self-discipline and
>> sometimes say "kick it to c.l.py".
Michael> .... I think it is important that comp.lang.python continues
Michael> to have *some* interesting content, and that the impression is
Michael> mantained that (reasonable) opinions expressed there are
Michael> listened to, ....
Whatever happened to the c.l.py weekly summary? David Ascher, Aaron Watters
& Fredrik Lundh I think were doing it for a long time. It seems that with
the python-dev archives on the web that perhaps the weekly editor could
occasionally point toward specific threads to provide a high-signal
intersection of the two lists. To expose interesting c.l.py threads to
python-dev folks who may not track the group closely any more, perhaps the
weekly summary could be posted here as well.
Skip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4