> I'm in favor of (as Trent Mick once suggested) getting exactly as insane as > C9X: they thought hard about this, and came up with a whole slew of new > symbolic names for the roles integral types play. We make typedefs of the > same names (well, for as many as we actually *need*) but with Py_ in front > of them. In time, as C9X takes over the world, the platform-#ifdef infested > section of pyport.h declaring them actually *shrinks*, as more & more > platforms support typedef'ing to the std C9X-defined names. Great idea. (Is a summary of these names online somewhere?) It's always good to reuse hard-won knowledge that someone else gathered. (Python is an example of this -- it encodes a lot of hard-won knowledge that I gathered, and more recently also that many other gathered. This rule is also self-referential.) --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://dinsdale.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4