[moved from patches to python-dev] [Bill Tutt] > Code currently in unicodeobject.c needs to do 32-bit arithmetic in > order to work. Additionally, UCS-4 characters (aka UTF-16 surrogate > characters) require 32 bits to represent the true unicode code point of a > surrogate pair. But is the requirement really for *exactly* 32 bits, or for *at least* 32 bits? The problem isn't with feebler machines, it's with higher-end ones: on some Python platforms, even sizeof(short) == 8. As is, your patch will prevent Python from compiling on those.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4