Tim Peters wrote: > > [moved from patches to Python-Dev] > > >> Patch #100745 has been updated. > >> Visit SourceForge.net for more info. > > > http://sourceforge.net/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=100745&group_id=5470 > > [Moshe] > > -1: Since when have we stopped supporting machines without 4-byte integral > > types? Or even non-standard 4 byte integral types? This looks extremely > > dangerous. > > Indeed, Python *does* run on machines that don't have any 4-byte integral > types -- or at least it used to <wink>. It doesn't run on any without an > integral type *at least* 32-bits wide, though. Wouldn't the latter be good > enough for this patch? That is, what's the requirement here for *exactly* > 32 bits? > > BTW, a sane collection of typedefs would be another good candidate for > pyport.h. Good idea. The only problem with typedefs is that they tend to cause conflicts when different definitions are encountered. We'd have to use e.g. Py_UINT4, Py_UINT2, etc... -- Marc-Andre Lemburg ______________________________________________________________________ Business: http://www.lemburg.com/ Python Pages: http://www.lemburg.com/python/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4