fred wrote: > Thomas Wouters writes: > > even be that gcc is right, that the larger code is faster, in spite of being > > larger. > > It may be faster, but that doesn't mean the tradeoff is right. ;) > Ideally, this shouldn't take a lot of space, simply because we don't > want to exclude platforms with substantial *memory* constraints. yeah, but people porting SRE to small platforms can switch off inlining completely. if I do that on windows, the resulting DLL is less than 20k. which is pretty okay, I think, if you consider that the DLL contains two separate regular expression engines, a scanner framework, and lots of other stuff... cheers /F
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4