> I'm pretty sure one of these should be "no_NO": > 0x0414: "nb_NO", # Norwegian (Bokmal) > 0x0814: "nn_NO", # Norwegian (Nynorsk) > But which one? Looking at http://lcweb.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/englangn.html, it seems the answer is "neither". I believe "no_NO" is used for traditional Norwegian on many systems (that would be Bokmål, right?). On a number of Unix systems (Linux, Solaris), Nynorsk is requested by appending "@nynorsk" to $LANG, e.g. no@nynorsk (Linux), no_NO.ISO8859-1@nynorsk (Solaris). The latter also recognizes no_NY for Nynorsk, but that doesn't sound too official. It seems that ISO 639-2:1998 isn't that widely implemented; is anybody actually using nn/nb? Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4