On 05 July 2000, Da Silva, Mike said:
> > > "expected dedent" -> "missing expected closing indentation"
>
> > Eugh. How about "expected decrease in indentation"? Though I think
> > dedent (or mabye outdent) is pretty obvious in context.
>
> > Also "decrease in indentation does not match any outer level"
> > is a pretty hefty error message.
>
> How about "expected unindent" ?
I was going to suggest "unindent" from the moment I saw Ping's patch, so
let me just chime in with a "yes indeed!".
Also, along with the rest of the known universe, I strongly favour the
proposed change. Haven't tried the patch yet, but I will.
Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4