Michael Hudson wrote:
>
> [me]
> > Here's another suggestion:
> >
> > "expected indent" -> "missing expected indentation"
>
> +0 - doesn't really change much does it?
It's slightly more explicit.
>
> > "expected dedent" -> "missing expected closing indentation"
>
> Eugh. How about "expected decrease in indentation"? Though I think
> dedent (or mabye outdent) is pretty obvious in context.
I like your correction.
The problem is that "dedent" is very context-specific and it would be
better if this term is avoided for user-messages, because they generally
pop up out of context (i.e. when your head is in another context, so
the context switch is painful).
--
Vladimir MARANGOZOV | Vladimir.Marangozov@inrialpes.fr
http://sirac.inrialpes.fr/~marangoz | tel:(+33-4)76615277 fax:76615252
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4