[Skip] > Mark> It would be great if there was some sort of "multi-platform" > Mark> support, and a merging of the results. > Agreed. We could set up a scheme where people run my scripts on other > systems and then mail me the generated files. Windows would be kind of > tough though, because my stuff currently relies on gcc/gcov. What > facilities does Windows have for coverage testing Mark? There is a source-profiler, but Im not sure how deep it lets you into the data. I'll look into this at some stage. Or some people are working towards gcc makefiles for windows - maybe that is a better way to go for this? Mark> Along the same vein is the Mozilla "tinderbox". It ... > That seems a bit extreme to me, and I don't know about you, but > I don't have > the spare resources available to "burn" on such a project. I think that the tinderbox code is open-source too! I agree this is a bit extreme, but I do believe something like it would be useful, and need not be too hard. As more and more checkins happen from different people, the chances of platform-breakage would seem to be quite high. A Python script that periodically scanned CVS for changes, then executed a build and did something pretty simple with the log wouldnt be too hard. However, I do agree we should wait until it is _nearly_ a problem (as opposed to _is_ a problem :-) Mark.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4