[Eric S. Raymond] > May I have developer status on the SourceForge CVS, please? I maintain > two standard-library modules (shlex and netrc) and have been involved > with the development of several others (including Cmd, smtp, httplib, and > multifile). > > My only immediate plan for what to do with developer access is to add > the browser-launch capability previously discussed on this list. My > general interest is in improving the standard class library, > especially in the areas of Internet-protocol support (urllib, ftp, > telnet, pop, imap, smtp, nntplib, etc.) and mini-language toolkits and > frameworks (shlex. netrc, Cmd, ConfigParser). > > If the Internet-protocol support in the library were broken out as a > development category, I would be willing to fill the patch-handler > slot for it. Eric, I just added you -- go nuts! Don't forget your docstrings, and try hard not to add new modules Guido will hate <0.9 wink -- but new modules do merit python-dev discussion first>. Ah, one more: the layout of the "Edit Member Permissions" admin page on SF is completely screwed up for me, so you got whatever the default permissions are. This looked fine to me a few days ago, but we've added several members since then. Would one of the admins using Netscape please check that page for sane display? I can't yet tell whether it's an IE5 or SF problem.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4